Skip to content

Removing Crucifixes

03 July 2011no comments Articles, Latest News

by Steven Chan
09 January 2011

The recent controversy about the purported request by governmental authorities to remove crucifixes in a meeting place so as not to offend a visiting dignitary is food for thought especially as regards the Christian’s response to similar situations.

The issue raises a few points that need careful consideration from the biblical perspective so that we can be of one mind in the event that we are asked about this matter.

The issue simply stated is “Is it right or appropriate for the church to remove the crucifixes in order not to offend a dignitary attending a function organised by believers?”

We have the following passage:-

Rom 13:1-8: “Let every soul be in subjection to the higher powers: for there is no power but of God; and the powers that be are ordained of God. Therefore he that resisteth the power, withstandeth the ordinance of God: and they that withstand shall receive to themselves judgment.  For rulers are not a terror to the good work, but to the evil. And wouldest thou have no fear of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise from the same: for he is a minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is a minister of God, an avenger for wrath to him that doeth evil. Wherefore ye must needs be in subjection, not only because of the wrath, but also for conscience’ sake. For this cause ye pay tribute also; for they are ministers of God’s service, attending continually upon this very thing. Render to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor. Owe no man anything, save to love one another: for he that loveth his neighbor hath fulfilled the law.” 

The afore-stated passage of scriptures teaches that we are to be subject to governing authorities “not only because of the wrath, but also for conscience’ sake” and that we are to “give them all that are due to them” (“Render to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor”) including to love them in accordance with the commandment to love our neighbour.

The question is: “Is the above biblical injunction violated by the action purportedly required by the governing authorities, i.e. to remove the crucifixes so as not to offend the governing dignitary?”

It appears that so-called “sacred crucifixes” are nowhere mentioned in the Bible – therefore they are not things that are required of Christians. Clearly there’s no biblical requirement for crucifixes to be present in the assemblies of the Christians. Hence, the issue of the removal of so-called “sacred crucifixes” ought not to arise in the first place.

Are crucifixes forbidden by the Scriptures in the churches or in the homes of Christians? There are no expressed or implied statements or examples in the Bible that I am aware of that forbid the presence of the physical symbol of a cross. 

The cross is referred quite frequently in the Scriptures, such as:-

Matt 16:24: If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
I Cor 1:17-18: “lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God
Gal 2:20  I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me
Gal 5:11: “And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? then is the offence of the cross ceased.” 
Gal 6:12: “As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh, they constrain you to be circumcised; only lest they should suffer persecution for the cross of Christ.” 
Gal 6:14: “But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.”
Eph 2:16: “And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross”
Phil 3:18: “(For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ:” 

From the above scriptures, it is clear that the cross is central to the Christian faith.

However, is the “physical symbol of the cross” a required matter or a forbidden matter?

The scriptures do not require Christians to carry the physical symbol of the cross everywhere he goes or to place it in the meeting place of the Christians. When Jesus said that one is take up his cross and follow Him, He obviously did not mean that we are to carry “physical crosses” with us everywhere – regardless of whether the crosses are big or small miniatures – there is also no evidence of any of the early Christians in the Bible doing any of that.

There are some who object to the use of the physical symbol of the cross because they contend that it is akin to worshiping idols.

Lev 26:1: “Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am the LORD your God.” 
Act 17:29: “Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.” 

The above scriptures teach us that we should not think of God in terms of “gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device” (Acts 17:29) for God is a Spirit and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth (John 4:24). Neither should we make “any graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it” (Lev 26:1). So God forbids thinking of God in physical terms or bowing down to any man-made image (i.e. worshiping the image). Notwithstanding the importance of the cross, in the event that people bow down to the image of the cross, then that would contravene the express statements of the Scriptures as such acts are clearly prohibited. Prima facie, it does not matter whether one has a physical cross or a physical symbol of the cross.

Perhaps the closest symbols for the cross or death of Jesus as shown in the Bible are:- 

(1) the act of baptism [Rom 6:3-6: “Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.  For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:  Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin”] and 

(2) the partaking of the Lord’s Supper [ I Cor 11:23-26: That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord’s death till he come.” 

But baptism and the Lord’s Supper are not physical symbols akin to crucifixes.

So, does the Bible prohibit the physical symbol of the cross? The facts are as follow:-
The cross is referred often in the Bible;
There is nothing in the Scriptures that prohibit the physical symbol of the cross so long as we do not think of God as being represented by the physical cross nor do we bow down to the physical cross as then that would contravene the express statements of the Scriptures.
Given that the physical symbol of the cross is neither a required matter nor a forbidden matter, it would come under the realm of “permitted” optional subject only to the further test of whether it is inexpedient.

Given the above guidance from the Scriptures as regards the cross (specifically that it comes under permitted optional subject to it being not expedient), is it wrong to remove the crucifixes from the meeting place in order not to offend the dignitaries?

It has been contended that the removal of the crucifixes tantamount to “valuing the presence of dignitaries” more than the “presence of God”. But the existence of the crucifixes does not represent of “God’s presence” and so, strictly speaking the issue does not arise.

But are there situations where the actions of Christians (although they are not required nor forbidden matters) tantamount to hypocrisy or denial of God?

The incident of Peter as recorded in Gal 2:11-14 may be instructive: “But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision. And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation. But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?”

Peter’s act of not wanting to offend certain Jews caused him to act hypocritically which caused Paul to accuse him of not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel. 

In the present instance, does the removal of the crucifixes fall under the same category of “hypocrisy” or not “walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel” insofar as the cross was offensive to those who reject the sacrifice of Christ as “propitiation for our sins” (I John 2:2)? Or, could this accommodation be deemed as being compliant with the principle in 1Cor 10:31-32: “So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. Give no offense to Jews or to Greeks or to the church of God”? In the latter passage it should be highlighted that Paul’s accommodation is for a specific purpose: “just as I try to please everyone in everything I do, not seeking my own advantage, but that of many, that they may be saved.”(1Cor 10:33) Could the action of removing the crucifixes be viewed as actions which seek to glorify God and that would contribute towards the salvation of others? 

Perhaps the appropriate action ought to have been not requiring the presence of these dignitaries as then there would be no perception of not “walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel”. It may also be wise not to have these crucifixes in the first place and thereby avoid any controversy relating to them.

On the other hand, if we are required to continue to accede to accommodate any actions which are deemed offensive to those who reject Jesus Christ then where will this end up? 

Can Christians stop accommodating unbelievers and insist on their legal rights of citizenship? Acts 28:17-19: “”Brothers, though I had done nothing against our people or the customs of our fathers, yet I was delivered as a prisoner from Jerusalem into the hands of the Romans. When they had examined me, they wished to set me at liberty, because there was no reason for the death penalty in my case. But because the Jews objected, I was compelled to appeal to Caesar–though I had no charge to bring against my nation.” In the case of Paul, he was compelled to appeal to Caesar over the allegations, charges and accusations of those who were offended by his actions of preaching the gospel and had wanted him to be subject to the death penalty. There were many other instances where Paul had been unfairly treated but he did not go to the courts or appeal to Caesar all the time (2 Cor 11:23-26). It appears that Paul was compelled to appeal to Caesar only as a last resort as his life was at risk of being taken away. So, whilst Christians may appeal as they are entitled to their legal rights, they are nonetheless required to be in subjection to the governing authorities as far as possible even though some may be unjust:-

1 Pet 2:12-19: “Keep your conduct among the Gentiles honorable, so that when they speak against you as evildoers, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day of visitation. Be subject for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good. For this is the will of God, that by doing good you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish people. Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God. Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor. Servants, be subject to your masters with all respect, not only to the good and gentle but also to the unjust. For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, one endures sorrows while suffering unjustly.”  

We live in challenging times and we need to take heed of the counsel of our Lord as stated in Matt 10:16: “Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves.”

Share This:

Spread The Love, Share Our Article

  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Newsvine
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

Related Posts

Comments

There are no comments on this entry.

Trackbacks

There are no trackbacks on this entry.